12:18 a.m.
Post via forum by datahead <cjj_009@xxxxxxxxxx>:
If we had some common Linux build(s) posted, it would allow testers to start hitting the
current build and provide bug reports.
In particular, we need them to test the menus. I think there may be some additional bugs,
but I will have to try some of them again myself. Once we get Windows builds working,
this would be another type of build. Providing builds would allow most testers to avoid
building Cegui or SFML.
I am not suggesting we enter a beta phase or release candidate phase yet, though I suppose
we could discuss that. Some of the bugs out there may take some more time to resolve, so
I think we should not rush the release at this point.
--
Sent by Chessboard.
8:22 a.m.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:18:58AM +0000, datahead wrote:
If we had some common Linux build(s) posted, it would allow testers
to
start hitting the current build and provide bug reports.
Yes, I agree with you in that. Ideally I would want to provide .deb
files for installing TSC as we have discussed before.
Once we get Windows builds working, this would be another
type of build. [...] I am not suggesting we enter a beta phase
When we released 2.0.0, did we combine the Beta with a Feature Freeze? I
think we did, as this allows to concentrate on bug squashing. If we do
this again, then we shold not start the beta phase yet indeed.
But nothing stops us from providing an "alpha" release...! One could
also simply call them "development snapshot", but I think the term
"alpha" is okay. Once we freeze the features, we enter the beta phase,
and when we deem it reasonably stable, we'll issue the first RC. Is that
an acceptable approach?
Vale,
Quintus
--
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de
PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F
6:42 p.m.
Post via forum by datahead <cjj_009@xxxxxxxxxx>:
[quote]When we released 2.0.0, did we combine the Beta with a Feature Freeze? I
think we did, as this allows to concentrate on bug squashing. If we do
this again, then we shold not start the beta phase yet indeed.[/quote]
Yes, to my recollection the betas were combined with a feature freeze.
Were there any more changes you had planned that are technically features?
I would be interested in seeing this feature readded:
https://github.com/Secretchronicles/TSC/issues/156
[quote]But nothing stops us from providing an "alpha" release...! One could
also simply call them "development snapshot", but I think the term
"alpha" is okay. Once we freeze the features, we enter the beta phase,
and when we deem it reasonably stable, we'll issue the first RC. Is that
an acceptable approach?[/quote]
It strikes me as a very good idea.
--
Sent by Chessboard.
1435
days inactive
1437
days old
tsc-devel@lists.secretchronicles.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
datahead -
Marvin Gülker