datahead <automailer(a)forum.secretchronicles.de> writes:
Post via forum by datahead <cjj_009@xxxxxxxxxx>: I hadn't
realized
most of the derived classes were calling the base class
implementations of the (currently empty) Scene methods. If we make
them pure virtual, though, I would probably say we should not have a
default implementation for now if it is going to be empty.
I agree, make these functions purely virtual. It may happen later that
we want to implement behaviour that is common to all scenes, but in that
case we can just remove the purely virtual definition again.
Vale,
Quintus
--
#!/sbin/quintus
Blog:
http://www.guelkerdev.de
GnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F